The Commuter

The Commuter (2018) - Run Time: 1h46m

Plot:

"In this action-packed thriller, Liam Neeson plays an insurance salesman, Michael, on his daily commute home, which quickly becomes anything but routine. After being contacted by a mysterious stranger, Michael is forced to uncover the identity of a hidden passenger on his train before the last stop. As he works against the clock to solve the puzzle, he realizes a deadly plan is unfolding and is unwittingly caught up in a criminal conspiracy. One that carries life and death stakes for himself and his fellow passengers.:

Review:

If you have seen a Liam Neeson film in the past decade (think Taken, Taken 2, Taken 3, Up all Night) and have enjoyed it, then this is the movie for you .  It is action packed, full of drama and suspense, and keeps you entertained.  The very beginning (first 5-10 minutes) is a little slow, but you forget about that once the action starts happening.  

So as I mentioned, this is a typical Liam Neeson film and therefore is somewhat predictable.  Neeson plays an ex-cop (of course), whose previous training and experiences come in handy when the action breaks out.  I love Liam Neeson, but unfortunately he is starting to get up there in age.  Even worse, he is starting to LOOK up there in age.  So when he gets in fights with guys who are a good 20-30 years younger than him it does seem a little over the top and unbelievable, but I am willing to forgive it because it is kind of to be expected with this type of movie.

This movie is somewhat predictable - you can see things coming before they happen - but it still manages a few twists and surprises so that you don't feel it was a total waste of time.  

Here's the long and short of it:  If you are looking for depth, sophistication, thought provoking and fabulous acting, you will be disappointed.  If you are looking for some fast pace action, over done fight scenes, predictable plot and general entertainment and fun, go see it.  If you don't like any violence or foul language, steer clear.  If you just want to escape for a few hours and have a good time, this is a great option.  

Rating: 7/10 - worth the watch and it will be one I flip on for entertainment sake when it shows up on t.v.

The Greatest Showman

The Greatest Showman (2017) - Run Time: 1h45min

Plot:

"THE GREATEST SHOWMAN is a bold and original musical that celebrates the birth of show business and the sense of wonder we feel when dreams come to life. Inspired by the ambition and imagination of P.T. Barnum, THE GREATEST SHOWMAN tells the story of a visionary who rose from nothing to create a mesmerizing spectacle that became a worldwide sensation."

Review:

So in case you missed it in the plot summary above - this is a musical.  If yo don't like musicals then you won't like this movie.  The person I went to see this with did not realize before hand that it was a musical and was then somewhat disappointed with the movie because it was not what she expected.  My stance on musicals is this: if you are going to pull off a musical then you need 1) an interesting story line, 2) good actors, and 3) good MUSIC!  I have seen many a musical in my day and my opinion has ranged from LOVED IT to HATED IT.  A few examples, just to give you an idea of where my opinion is coming from: Mamma Mia - it was ok - good actors, fine plot, good music, but sung by TERRIBLE singers.  Les Miserables - HATED IT!  It felt like it went on forever, not a good plot, so-so acting and TERRIBLE music - it was the same song over and over again!  I left the theatre wanting to get back the 3 hours of my life I wasted (I realize there are many people who will disagree with me).  

This one actually surprised me with how much I liked it.  The plot was interesting, especially considering it was based on fact.  I really like many of the stars in this film (Michelle Williams, Zac Effron, Hugh Jackman) and unlike some other musicals - this cast can actually SING!  I found the whole movie engaging and was actually a little sad when it ended.

I also loved the music in this one - which is obviously important to one's overall opinion of a movie musical.  The songs were catchy, and it didn't sound like they just used the same song and changed the lyrics.  In fact, I would even consider putting a few of the songs from this soundtrack onto my iPod.

I found myself tapping my toes throughout and really got invested in the characters.

One thing I didn't love about the movie - I didn't feel there was enough character development when it came to the people with exceptionalities who joined the circus.  Yes, I realize that they are not the main characters, and that the main story revolves around Hugh Jackman's character, but considering the huge part these characters played in his life, it would have been nice to get to know them more as people, and not just for their "freak" characteristics.  I think it did at least give some of them names, however they were referred to so rarely that I honestly can't remember them.  I would have liked to know more about them - their backgrounds, how they felt about being in the spotlight, etc.  Perhaps this is another movie waiting to happen!

Anyway, long story short - it was cheesy (as most musicals are), it was predictable, it was entertaining, and I enjoyed every minute of it.  If you generally enjoy musicals I would bet you will like this one, if not, steer clear.  

Rating: 8.5/10 - I will definitely be watching this one again.

Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle

Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle (2017) - Run Time: 1h59min

Plot:

"The legend of Jumanji continues as the game comes to life once again. In the new adventure, Dwayne Johnson, Jack Black, Kevin Hart and Karen Gillan are pitted against stampeding rhinos, mambas, saber-toothed tigers, and a jungle full of traps and puzzles, forcing them to play the ultimate game of survival."

Review:

So remember what I just said in my last review about sequels?  Well this one is a rare exception.  Jumanji: Welcome to the Jungle is a SIGNIFICANT improvement over the original movie.  I'm actually not sure if this should be called a sequel or a re-make, but I'm going with sequel just because it doesn't take the same form as the original movie.  In all fairness, the original did come out way back in 1995 and starred the amazing Robin Williams - so expectations in comparison to this one need to be kept in check.  However, I remember seeing the first Jumanji when it came out way back then (I was 11 at the time) - and even back then it was TERRIBLE.  I loved Robin Williams but even as a child in the target age group I HATED this movie!  I found it sooooo boring!  The 2017 version is far from that!

I really loved how this movie tried to update the original and bring it into this century.  There is even a nod to the original near the beginning.  A man jogging on the beach finds the Jumanji board game in the sand and brings it home to his teenage son, who, as a video game addict, comments "who plays board games anymore?".  So, the board game itself creates a video game version to bring more people into the game.  And thus, this movie becomes relevant again.

First off let me say this was a PG movie, and there were a ton of kids in the theater when I went to see it.  However, it has a lot of humour aimed at the adults in the room that would go right over kids heads.  On top of that, there was some wearing throughout, which I heard several kids comment on.  So if you are a parent planning on taking your kid to this, just be aware, this is not a G rated movie for a reason.

I think the thing that made this movie as good as it was, was the amazing casting.  The Rock (Dwayne Johnson) was hilarious in his roll, and no one can play a teenage girl trapped in the body of an old man quite like Jack Black!  They kept me laughing throughout the entire movie!!  There was plenty of kid humour and slapstick comedy, intermixed with jokes meant to keep the adults entertained.

On the down side, I found this movie to be a little long, especially for a movie aimed at kids.  This one almost hit the 2 hour mark, and by 1 1/2 hours I found myself eagerly awaiting the end.  Funny or no, it seemed to be unnecessarily long, especially given the simplistic plot.  There were a few parts that could have been cut down or just plain cut out.  It was also predictable - but I won't hold it against them as this WAS a kids movie.

I'm glad I saw it - it was fun and entertaining - however this isn't one I'll be likely to watch again. 

Rating: 7/10 - if I were rating the original, I would have given it a 2, so this one is a huge improvement over that one.  It just seemed to go on a little too long.  If it had been 45min shorter I probably would have given it an 8.  

Pitch Perfect 3

Pitch Perfect 3 (2017) - Run Time: 1h34min

Plot:

"After the highs of winning the World Championships, the Bellas find themselves split apart and discovering there aren't job prospects for making music with your mouth. But when they get the chance to reunite for an overseas USO tour, this group of awesome nerds will come together to make some music, and some questionable decisions, one last time." 

Review:

Obviously, this is a sequel, which in and of itself should automatically lower expectations.  Rarely does a sequel come close to it's original.  Unfortunately, that remains true in this case as well.  Let me be clear, I still enjoyed it, it was still plenty entertaining - but when compared to the first, it was utter crap.

Bad Points:

First off, several important characters who were in the original do not make appearances.  Jesse (Skylar Astin), Bumper (Adam Devine), and Benji (Ben Platt) are nowhere to be seen (along with any of the other Treblemakers).  Now I get they were probably trying to go somewhere new with this one and didn't want to fall back on the same old plot lines they had before, but these boys added some looks and serious humour to the movies and I for one missed them.  On top of that, Stacie (Alexis Knapp) was barely in it and she was also one of my favourite characters.

Lets talk about the plot - without giving anything away let me just say that some of what happens to the Bellas on their USO tour is absolutely ridiculous.  It makes no sense and is a completely bizarre direction to take the movie into.  This movie is by far more farcical and slapstick than the previous two.

Finally, while there was some great singing (and a lot of awesome covers), there was a lack of mash ups, which is a hallmark of Pitch Perfect movies, and another one of my favourite components.

Good Points:

Although I felt that some important characters were lacking screen time (or simply just lacking in full), there were some awesome new editions to the cast.  For one, Ruby Rose (who plays Calamity, a member of another group performing in the tour) is great.  Her voice is fantastic (I am assuming it was actually her singing, as that seems to be something required of cast members),she's funny and she adds some of that banter and rivalry missing from the departure of the Treblemakers.

The singing in this one was awesome - it certainly did not disappoint.  I loved many of the songs they chose to cover, and they introduced characters who used instruments to play and not just A Capella, which adds another dimension to some of the performances.

Overall, I think this was definitely the worst of the 3 movies by far, however the music may have been better than the second one.  Having said that, I still thoroughly enjoyed it.  It was totally entertaining and I'm glad I saw it.  If you saw (and enjoyed) the first 2 films I definitely recommend seeing it, just lower your expectations a little before you sit down.  

Rating: 8 1/2 /  for music, 7 for plot and overall movie - worth a watch but not nearly as good as the original.